From: William P. <wil...@ya...> - 2012-12-04 16:06:44
|
Hi Mattison, This sounds great, thanks. While load-balancing might be a problem for the Dryad push handshaking, it should not be a problem for downloads-only (e.g. the purls). bp On Dec 4, 2012, at 9:14 AM, Mattison Ward wrote: > Hi all. > > During some recent testing by the Open Tree of Life folks, I was > reminded that the Treebase site can stop responding if it gets many > rapid requests to download files in nexml format and, to a lesser > extent, in the other formats. I realized that it would take a trivial > amount of effort to load balance the Tomcat download processing to > some idle servers we have available. All other requests except > downloads would still be served by the current web server. This > avoids having to worry about session persistance and file uploads. Of > course, this does not speed up downloads of files in any format, but > it does give us a pipeline so the site can handle several concurrent > downloads without locking up. > > I have this set up now (and caching turned off for testing) on > treebase-dev.nescent.org. Hilmar has approved using the idle systems > for load balancing. Unless someone objects, I would like to enable > this load balancing of file downloads on the production site at > treebase.org on Thursday morning. > > Regards, > > Mattison |