From: Carl B. <cbo...@gm...> - 2011-05-11 16:10:20
|
Hi Dryad team, Treebase team, Thanks Hilmar, here's an example: For instance, this Dryad entry<http://datadryad.org/handle/10255/dryad.8661> does not point to this treebase entry,<http://treebase.org/treebase-web/search/study/anyObjectAsRDF.rdf?namespacedGUID=TB2:S11266> Perhaps this is just because it is a recent entry? The treebase entry in this cahas the Dryad id under a tag I didn't expect: <tb:title.study xmlns:tb="http://treebase.org/terms#">dryad_8661</tb:title.study> Meanwhile this Dryad entry<http://datadryad.org/handle/10255/dryad.4939?show=full> does have the treebase identifer, but the treebase entry doesn't have the dryad identifier<http://treebase.org/treebase-web/search/study/anyObjectAsRDF.rdf?namespacedGUID=TB2:S84> . -Carl On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Hilmar Lapp <hl...@ne...> wrote: > Hi Carl - > > first off, the perfect place to ask these and related questions is the > Dryad Developers Google Group [1], which is public. I'm copying some of this > thread there. > > The DataONE API implementation in R is as far as I understand not pretty > and far from mature, but in principle functional. I'm copying Dave Vieglais, > who should be able to point you to the appropriate places in the DataONE svn > repository. > > Our handshaking mechanism with TreeBASE is in principle designed (or was in > my understanding) such that TreeBASE studyIDs and Dryad DOIs are harvested > and updated on the respective ends. (Completing a TreeBASE submission is > asynchronous from, and can take a lot longer than, completing the > "containing" Dryad submission.) If you have an example for where that > doesn't seem to have worked, can you post that here? > > Cheers, > > -hilmar > > [1] http://groups.google.com/group/dryad-dev > > On May 10, 2011, at 1:30 AM, Carl Boettiger wrote: > > Hi Ryan, > > I am working on implementing the TreeBASE API in R, and am implemented in > extending this to the DataDryad and DataONE APIs. (In case you're curious, > the project development is currently hosted on github<https://github.com/cboettig/treeBASE>. > Pretty straight forward, so far just done the PhyloWS side, hoping to do the > OAI-PMH side next). > > Todd suggests that there is already an implementation of the DataONE API in > R, which is great to hear. Do you know who's involved in this, and what > state it's in? I'd be happy to help test or whatnot. I've started looking > at what's available for the investigator-level API<http://mule1.dataone.org/ArchitectureDocs-current/apis/index.html>for DataONE; is this the current documentation? > > William Piel also forwarded you a question from my about getting the > treebase and dryad data better integrated -- the treebase metadata doesn't > currently include the dryad dois, and it seems the dryad dois don't include > the treebase study ids. Certainly this would be a pretty valuable to have, > though I suppose a work-around might be possible by matching other metadata > in the search? > > Anyway, nice to meet you, and look forward to hearing a bit more about what > directions you're heading with this. Is there an appropriate forum / > mailing list to discuss the APIs for Dryad and DataONE? > > Thanks much, > > Carl > > -- > Carl Boettiger > UC Davis > http://www.carlboettiger.info/ > > > -- > =========================================================== > : Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- informatics.nescent.org : > =========================================================== > > > > -- Carl Boettiger UC Davis http://www.carlboettiger.info/ |