From: Hilmar L. <hl...@ne...> - 2011-04-19 14:03:34
|
On Apr 19, 2011, at 6:34 AM, Rutger Vos wrote: > Not sure if I was supposed to know that - so any commit goes live on > the production server immediately? On dev only, not production. I can dig through the mailing list archives, but if my recollection is correct, this was discussed here and agreed to by Bill. > That means I'm going to have to change my commit behavior, I tend to > commit files individually so that I can give more specific messages > to explain the changes in each of them. I've shared that concern. I still think we shouldn't change commit behavior; just be prepared that sometimes the Hudson builds will fail while you're in the midst of something. In part this is also a result of our not better exploiting the capabilities of version control. It's arguably not the best idea to do development of features or changes that amount to more than "atomic" bug fixes on the main trunk. If we were on git, this would probably mostly solve itself, as branching and switching between branches is just so easy that there are few excuses not to do it. Merges back to master would then contain all the changes that as a whole would not break the build. But it's not that svn doesn't support branching and merging. > Do I have a login on hudson? I don't know - ask for one if you need one (do you?). -hilmar -- =========================================================== : Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- informatics.nescent.org : =========================================================== |