[Treebase-guts] SF.net SVN: treebase:[790] trunk/treebase-core/src/main/java/org/cipres/ treebase/domain/tree/PhyloTreeNode.java

[<rv...@us...>]

Revision: 790
          http://treebase.svn.sourceforge.net/treebase/?rev=790&view=rev
Author:   rvos
Date:     2011-04-19 11:17:37 +0000 (Tue, 19 Apr 2011)

Log Message:
-----------
No longer returning the context (i.e. the defining tree) so that we don't emit rdfs:isDefinedBy annotations, which are not useful on tree nodes anyway - because they have no other annotations, so why turn them into RDF? Things are less verbose this way.

Modified Paths:
--------------
    trunk/treebase-core/src/main/java/org/cipres/treebase/domain/tree/PhyloTreeNode.java

Modified: trunk/treebase-core/src/main/java/org/cipres/treebase/domain/tree/PhyloTreeNode.java
===================================================================
--- trunk/treebase-core/src/main/java/org/cipres/treebase/domain/tree/PhyloTreeNode.java	2011-04-19 11:16:03 UTC (rev 789)
+++ trunk/treebase-core/src/main/java/org/cipres/treebase/domain/tree/PhyloTreeNode.java	2011-04-19 11:17:37 UTC (rev 790)
@@ -595,9 +595,15 @@
 		return getTaxonLabelAsString();
 	}
 	
+	
+	/*
+	 * If there are no annotations on individual nodes there is no good reason to have them
+	 * be "seen" in the RDF anyway, which they would be if we state them as being defined by
+	 * their containing tree. So let's skip that for now.
 	@Override
 	@Transient
 	public PhyloTree getContext() {
 		return getTree();
 	}
+	*/
 }


This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source development site.