Re: [Treebase-devel] viz problem with trees for S11267

[Vladimir G. <vga...@ne...>]

On Apr 14, 2011, at 4:00 PM, William Piel wrote:

> PS - Hmm...  Rod, do you know you do have a way of loving-and-then- 
> hating things? :-)
>
> On Apr 14, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Roderic Page wrote:
>> 7. Never, ever mention RDF.
>
> On Apr 14, 2011, at 1:05 PM, Roderic Page wrote:
>> I ... was once an enthusiast [of RDF]
>
> On Apr 14, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Roderic Page wrote:
>> Bonus points for not mentioning XML.
>
>
> On May 20, 2004, at 7:37 PM, Roderic D. M. Page wrote:
>> [I think TreeBASE should] store data (say, the character states for  
>> a taxon) as an XML formatted BLOB.
>
> On Jan 15, 2006, at 4:15 PM, Roderic Page wrote:
>> once one of the major providers adopts LSIDs (my money is on uBio),  
>> whatever they adopt will drive standards
>
> On Apr 1, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Roderic D. M. Page wrote:
>> I think that [LSIDs have] been the Achilles heel of biodiversity  
>> informatics.
>
> [etc..]
>

Evolution?  Someone will build a tree from this!
-V