From: William P. <wil...@ya...> - 2011-04-14 03:20:18
|
On Apr 13, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Hilmar Lapp wrote: > The trees in S11267 seem to silently fail to render in PhyloWidget. > All I get is a single dot. At least try the first three: > > http://www.treebase.org/treebase-web/search/study/trees.html?id=11267 > > Is this a temporary glitch, a problem with the reconstructed file, or > something else? Should I best file this as a bug in the bug tracker? > > -hilmar > Thanks for the alert. This is actually a bug in PhyloWidget -- if the word "tree" appears in the title of the tree block, PhyloWidget confuses this word with the TREE command, and so goofs up the parsing. I have removed the word "tree" from the tree block, so it works now. However, you might need to refresh the PhyloWidget window after loading to get the tree to pull through -- TreeBASE feels quite slow lately; our API must be getting hit by someone (Rod?). bp |