Re: [Treebase-devel] Disk space for treebase production database

[Hilmar L. <hl...@ne...>]

Jon - can you update us where we are with this? It sounds like a slow- 
down of around 30% would be acceptable to Bill (Bill, correct me if  
that's misinterpreting you), and it would be to me, too.

	-hilmar

On Aug 7, 2010, at 6:09 AM, William Piel wrote:

>
> On Aug 6, 2010, at 3:04 PM, William Piel wrote:
>
>> As a test file, I have a large NEXUS (attached) which I uploaded to  
>> the treebase.org site, and it took me 7 minutes 51 seconds.
>
> I just tested this file by uploading to http://treebase-dev.nescent.org/treebase-web/
>
> Time taken: 9 minutes 22 seconds -- compared with 7 minutes 51  
> seconds. So although one took longer, they both succeeded in  
> uploading. It's certainly possible that some larger files will run  
> into the 15-min timeout faster with dev than normal treebase.
>
> In terms of searching, the performance is closer: going from an  
> identical selection of taxa to a selection of studies took 27  
> seconds on treebase and 36 seconds on treebase-dev.
>
> bp
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by
>
> Make an app they can't live without
> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Treebase-devel mailing list
> Tre...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/treebase-devel

-- 
===========================================================
: Hilmar Lapp  -:- Durham, NC -:- informatics.nescent.org :
===========================================================