From: William P. <wil...@ya...> - 2010-08-05 23:18:59
|
On Aug 5, 2010, at 11:54 PM, Jon Auman wrote: > Treebaseprod (on dev server) is 123 GB as compared to 180 GB for the production database on the main treebase.org website. I'm OK with testing the performance on treebaseprod as it would save us a day of restores and the size is still significant. I will need to point treebase-dev.nescent.org to that database should that be the way we want to go. > > Let me know. > > Thanks, > Jon This seems okay to me, given our constraints (Hilmar - WDYT?). Even if the 123 GB version underestimates performance slow-down, and so when the final deployment happens we're not happy with the result -- I assume we can still go for a plan-b option? bp |