Re: [Treebase-devel] Disk space for treebase production database

[William P. <wil...@ya...>]

On Aug 5, 2010, at 8:41 PM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:

> I would expect the primary source of  
> performance degradation, if there is one, to come from updating large  
> indexes, which, if done record by record that is inserted

Okay. On treebasedb-dev there is a database called treebaseprod, which might be closest in size to the current production database. If we have a build that points to that, perhaps that would be our best performance comparison? Or alternatively, perhaps delete treebaseprod and replace it with a duplicate of the current database -- that would provide the closest size for performance comparison. 

bp