Re: [Treebase-devel] reconfiguring the purls

[Hilmar L. <hl...@ne...>]

On Jun 4, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Rutger Vos wrote:

>>
>> But why can't the redirection from
>> http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/tree/16354 to
>> http://treebase.org/phylows/tree/16354 be a 301 or a 302? They should
>> probably also be connected by owl:sameAs. In fact, because they are
>> owl:sameAs, shouldn't they be redirected through 301 or 302,  
>> because 303
>> says "See also". But this is not seeAlso - they are owl:sameAs!
>
> Eh, ok, where would we make that owl:sameAs statement?


Well, in the RDF of course.

So if someone dereferences http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/tree/16354 
  and wants RDF, they get first redirected (using 301 or 302 in my  
opinion) to http://treebase.org/phylows/tree/16354, which is resolved  
via 303 to http://treebase.org/phylows/tree/16354?format=rdf through  
content negotiation. In the RDF, you can say that http://treebase.org/phylows/tree/16354 
  owl:sameAs http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/tree/16354

	-hilmar
-- 
===========================================================
: Hilmar Lapp  -:- Durham, NC -:- informatics.nescent.org :
===========================================================