Re: [Treebase-devel] [evointerop] iEvoBio plans

[Rutger V. <rut...@gm...>]

Great, thanks, here's my opening sentence right now: TreeBASE[1] is a
database of peer-reviewed phylogenetic data and metadata.

1. http://treebase.org, source code available at
http://sf.net/projects/treebase/ under a BSD license.

So it's the first footnote. I suppose that's OK?

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Hilmar Lapp <hl...@ne...> wrote:
>
> On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Rutger Vos wrote:
>
>> I know there's a requirement to have an open source license, I'm not sure
>> that means I'd have to mention it in the abstract.
>
> Yes, you should mention it in the abstract. (The documentation states that.)
> If you don't, reviewers (or committee members) have to go looking for it.
>
>> If I do, would it be OK to just say TreeBASE is released under a
>> "BSD-style license"?
>
> Why not say "BSD license"? Isn't it a BSD license? "BSD-style" sounds more
> wishy-washy than it is.
>
>        -hilmar
>
> --
> ===========================================================
> : Hilmar Lapp  -:- Durham, NC -:- informatics.nescent.org :
> ===========================================================
>
>
>
>



-- 
Dr. Rutger A. Vos
School of Biological Sciences
Philip Lyle Building, Level 4
University of Reading
Reading
RG6 6BX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0) 118 378 7535
http://www.nexml.org
http://rutgervos.blogspot.com