Re: [Treebase-devel] Incompatibility with Internet Explorer 7

[Rutger V. <rut...@gm...>]

I am going to attempt to make things work with Internet Explorer 8 -
which is the one that came with my VM - but I don't think we should be
spending time making IE7 happy as well. At this point it's used less
often than either IE8, Chrome or Firefox - and usage is obviously
dropping (IE9 is now under development). Is that fair?

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:38 PM, William Piel <wil...@ya...> wrote:
>
> We have a report (below) that the analysis entries are not visible
> in Internet Explorer 7 (except by copy/pasting to a text file). Could
> someone with this browser test our interface? I'm guessing that it can't be
> the only place that is incompatible. Meanwhile, I'll create a bug report.
> bp
>
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Ben Wielstra <wie...@it...>
> Date: March 22, 2010 6:48:29 AM EDT
> To: William Piel <wil...@ya...>
> Subject: RE: TreeBASE Submission S10307
>
> Dear mister Piel,
>
> Sorry for my last email, I see the trees are already included in the file.
> Thanks for this.
>
> I have just updated the last field: the analysis. This seems to be not
> running smootly yet because I am not able to see what I have filled in here
> (using Internet Explorer 7) unless I copy paste it to a text editor.
>
> There are now some redundant data matrices uploaded which I am not able to
> discard. Is it possible to get rid of these? Also, the taxa list seems to
> have trouble with the numbers used to code for taxa in the tree block.
>
> Compared to the old database (which I never used, I only looked at it) there
> is now the advantage that the submission number stays the same right? I can
> refer to submission 10307 before changing the submission to the ready state?
>
> Thanks for your troubles,
> Ben
>
> ________________________________________
> Van: William Piel [wil...@ya...]
> Verzonden: zondag 21 maart 2010 20:53
> Aan: Ben Wielstra
> Onderwerp: TreeBASE Submission S10307
>
> Dear Ben Wielstra,
>
> Thanks for trying out our new version of TreeBASE.
>
> I noticed that the trees were having trouble getting parsed. In one instance
> it was because the "tree" command was missing in the TREES block. In other
> instances, a TAXON block was missing, which is a problem for Mesquite v. 2.
>
> I've uploaded a new version after saving the file in Mesquite.
>
> (attached is the file I uploaded, in case you want to examine it)
>
> regards,
>
> Bill
> Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC)
> University of Twente
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Treebase-devel mailing list
> Tre...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/treebase-devel
>
>



-- 
Dr. Rutger A. Vos
School of Biological Sciences
Philip Lyle Building, Level 4
University of Reading
Reading
RG6 6BX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0) 118 378 7535
http://www.nexml.org
http://rutgervos.blogspot.com