From: William P. <wil...@ya...> - 2010-03-19 13:27:32
|
On Mar 19, 2010, at 12:13 AM, William Piel wrote: > On Mar 18, 2010, at 11:10 PM, William Piel wrote: > >> only be the time I reached S2256 did the mapping work again. > > It looks to me like the mis-mapping of taxa is concentrated between S2257 and S10215. Before S2257, the data look okay. After S10215, they also perform okay. Vladimir -- are you investigating this issue? bp |