From: Vladimir G. <vla...@du...> - 2010-03-16 20:20:17
|
On Mar 16, 2010, at 3:54 PM, William Piel wrote: > > On Mar 16, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Vladimir Gapeyev wrote: > >> There were 1002 trees with the null treetype, now there are only 33 >> (below). > > For the remaining 33, can you give them "single" trees (which is > kind of our default) done --vg |