From: Rutger V. <rut...@gm...> - 2010-02-15 11:44:08
|
I would like to hear what use cases Ryan (the original poster of the ticket) had in mind and what needs to happen to meet his requirements. Is there a dryad<->treebase interoperability use case you're trying to implement? On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Hilmar Lapp <hl...@ne...> wrote: > > On Feb 14, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Matt wrote: > >> I suppose though that you could add many lat/longs to one cell (through >> specimens)? > > Yes, attaching to OTUs should not preclude the ability to attach those to > cells, and in principle one should be able to attach any number of > geo-coordinates. > > It's an interesting question though whether the geo-coordinate as a property > of the specimen should (automatically?) propagate to the cell (or OTU) that > the specimen is attached to. In principle, I suppose the answer should be > yes, and in a perfect Linked Data world a reasoning framework or phylo-data > browser should be able to look up the specimen metadata if a specimen is > attached, and infer the geo-coordinates for the cell or OTU. > > -hilmar > > -- > =========================================================== > : Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- informatics.nescent.org : > =========================================================== > > > > -- Dr. Rutger A. Vos School of Biological Sciences Philip Lyle Building, Level 4 University of Reading Reading RG6 6BX United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 118 378 7535 http://www.nexml.org http://rutgervos.blogspot.com |