Re: [Treebase-devel] Large accession numbers after switch to hibernate_sequence

[Hilmar L. <hl...@ne...>]

The TB code *already used* a single sequence. I guess the change is  
now that the study ID is drawn from that sequence too - apparently  
previously even Hibernate used a separate sequence for that? I'm sure  
if desired this can be restored.

	-hilmar

On Jan 27, 2010, at 10:06 AM, William Piel wrote:

>
> On Jan 26, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Vladimir Gapeyev wrote:
>
>> The new study / submission that I created for testing purposes is
>> being referred to as "submission 160000013040" or "Study
>> 160000013050".   Do we agree it is a feature, not a bug, that TB2
>> accession numbers will be large and grow by huge leaps from one study
>> to the next?
>
> I guess this is inevitable by virtue of using a single sequence for  
> all tables. I would have preferred to issue smaller accession  
> numbers, but I gather there were good reasons to use the single  
> sequence.
>
> bp
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
> Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the  
> business
> Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term  
> contracts
> Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call  
> away.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
> _______________________________________________
> Treebase-devel mailing list
> Tre...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/treebase-devel

-- 
===========================================================
: Hilmar Lapp  -:- Durham, NC -:- informatics.nescent.org :
===========================================================