From: William P. <wil...@ya...> - 2010-01-27 15:21:03
|
On Jan 26, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Vladimir Gapeyev wrote: > The new study / submission that I created for testing purposes is > being referred to as "submission 160000013040" or "Study > 160000013050". Do we agree it is a feature, not a bug, that TB2 > accession numbers will be large and grow by huge leaps from one study > to the next? I guess this is inevitable by virtue of using a single sequence for all tables. I would have preferred to issue smaller accession numbers, but I gather there were good reasons to use the single sequence. bp |