Re: [Treebase-devel] Citation metadata for 2009 additions

[Rutger V. <rut...@gm...>]

Actually, I do seem to recall that the import program attached more
and more authors over incremental runs.

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:14 PM, William Piel <wil...@ya...> wrote:
>
> On Jan 12, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't that complicate the data import in some way? I'm OK if it doesn't, but if it does I think we may need to defer until after the release.
>
> If the citation-update-scirpt can take the Endnote output and update 284 records, I don't see why it can't take a bigger Endnote output and update 2,350 records (which is total number of citations now in TreeBASE1). I don't recall that this is a slow process, and it should have been designed for multi- and incremental updates.
>
> If Mark didn't design it for multiple & incremental updating (e.g. if each time you run it it creates more and more duplicate author records), than yes, we should only do the 284-record update.  Perhaps Vladimir can examine the code and confirm that it is designed for multiple runs of the same script on the same set of records.
>
> bp
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
> Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
> A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
> Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Treebase-devel mailing list
> Tre...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/treebase-devel
>



-- 
Dr. Rutger A. Vos
School of Biological Sciences
Philip Lyle Building, Level 4
University of Reading
Reading
RG6 6BX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0) 118 378 7535
http://www.nexml.org
http://rutgervos.blogspot.com