Re: [Treebase-devel] Deletion of cipres framework

[youjun g. <you...@ya...>]

Hilmar,

This code refactoring may take a week or a bit longer, should I proceed?



Youjun



On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Hilmar Lapp <hl...@ne...> wrote:

> Can we give those 7 java classes some more attention as to why they are
> needing the CIPRES framework to compile? Let's remember, we know for a fact
> that code that relies on that framework is guaranteed not to function.
>
> We should at least know what it is in those 7 classes that we know can't be
> functional because it needs the CIPRES framework. Leaving that code in there
> because we need it is the same as saying, there is code in there that we
> need but that we know doesn't work. I'm not comfortable with this.
>
> -hilmar
>
>
> On Jan 14, 2010, at 3:46 PM, youjun guo wrote:
>
> I checked into TreeBase code and found 7 java classes still need cipres
> framework 1.1 to compile. I suggest we keep it for now.
>
> Youjun
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
> world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for
> Conference
> attendees to learn about information security's most important issues
> through
> interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev_______________________________________________
> Treebase-devel mailing list
> Tre...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/treebase-devel
>
>
> --
> ===========================================================
> : Hilmar Lapp  -:- Durham, NC -:- informatics.nescent.org :
> ===========================================================
>
>
>
>