Re: [Treebase-devel] TreeBASE2 Release Plan

[Hilmar L. <hl...@ne...>]

On Dec 7, 2009, at 6:14 AM, Rutger Vos wrote:

>> BTW once we've filled everything in I would like to move the table to
>> the TreeBASE wiki (which is public). Since the motivation for not
>> starting it there isn't to keep it private until then but rather ease
>> of editing it, let me know if anyone would have a problem or concerns
>> with the Google Doc being made public right away.
>
> Why the wiki? Can't we just stick them in the tracker with the
> understanding that the highest priority (9) means pre-release
> milestone?

An issue tracker is not the same thing as a release plan, so they are  
not redundant at all to me. The tracker adds a lot of stuff that's  
important for tracking issues, but clutter for a release plan. There  
are things about a release plan that have little to do with tracking  
resolution of issues.

I don't share your concern that these could go out-of-sync. We are not  
going to track resolution in the release plan (except to update when  
something is complete), and if tasks get added to or removed from  
critical for release-status we need to be more explicit about that  
than updating the priority in the tracker (which will remain obscure  
to most on the stakeholder team).

	-hilmar
-- 
===========================================================
: Hilmar Lapp  -:- Durham, NC -:- informatics.nescent.org :
===========================================================