From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-11-20 16:46:42
|
Bugs item #2692361, was opened at 2009-03-18 18:27 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by rvos You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126676&aid=2692361&group_id=248804 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: data Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 9 Private: No Submitted By: Mark Dominus (mjdominus) Assigned to: Rutger Vos (rvos) Summary: Botched tree loading Initial Comment: Study #235 has 7 trees; each has only one phylotreenode. This is wrong. The trees are defined in the dump file treebase-data/tree/A160c2x6x96c17c39c42.tre, attached with this bug report. They are supposed to have around 13 leaf nodes each. The (erroneous) versions in the database now are as follows: | | | |-PhyloTree #4347 (T373c2x6x96c17c40c07) | | | |-PhyloTree #4348 (T374c2x6x96c17c40c12) | | | |-PhyloTree #4349 (T375c2x6x96c17c40c15) | | | |-PhyloTree #4350 (T376c2x6x96c17c40c18) | | | |-PhyloTree #4351 (T377c2x6x96c17c40c22) | | | |-PhyloTree #4352 (T378c2x6x96c17c40c25) | | | |-PhyloTree #4353 (T379c2x6x96c17c40c28) There may be many other such erroneous trees in the database; a query finds 86 trees with NTAX < 2. Figure out what went wrong. Reload the broken trees and reattach them to the studies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Rutger Vos (rvos) Date: 2009-11-20 16:46 Message: I now consider this as being subsumed by issue #2897306 so I am closing this one and close the other one once the trees are re-loaded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126676&aid=2692361&group_id=248804 |