From: youjun g. <you...@ya...> - 2009-10-14 19:20:22
|
Thanks to make it clear, Ryan. "Service provider" and "harvester" are not inter-changeable. Harvester doesn't have to "provider useful service" except harvesting. I believe the community may think "providing service" is out of the scope of meta date harvesting. Do the community also reject the term "data provider" ? Youjun On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Ryan Scherle <rsc...@ne...> wrote: > The OAI-PMH standard uses the terminology "service provider" to mean > "entity who harvests data and provides a useful service". The digital > library community essentially rejected this terminology in favor of > "harvester", but the standards documents have never been changed. To reduce > confusion, we should use "harvester". > > -- Ryan > > > On Oct 13, 2009, at 5:38 PM, Hilmar Lapp wrote: > > >> On Oct 13, 2009, at 9:14 AM, youjun guo wrote: >> >> Thanks hilmar, It will be renamed to oai-pmh_data_provider, tell >>> from oai-pmh service provider. >>> >> >> I'm a fan of descriptive names, but what is the difference again >> between the oai-pmh service provider and the oai-pmh data provider? >> >> I thought we only have an oai-pmh provider and an oai-pmh harvester? >> >> -hilmar >> >> -- >> =========================================================== >> : Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at duke dot edu : >> =========================================================== >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA >> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your >> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay >> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference >> _______________________________________________ >> Treebase-devel mailing list >> Tre...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/treebase-devel >> > > |