From: William H. P. <pi...@tr...> - 2009-06-23 21:40:22
|
Dear David and Wayne, As you know, TreeBASE is using a headless version of Mesquite to parse all incoming data. I've noticed that although Mesquite is happy parsing a tree with a translation table (but without a taxon block), for some reason it doesn't like trees that lack a translation table and a taxon block. For these tree files (e.g. the default tree file produced by MrBayes -- see attached), I get the following message: A block of trees has been read for which no corresponding block of taxa has been found, and no block of taxa could be created for it. If you had expected that the trees would have applied to an existing block of taxa, it is possible that the taxa no longer correspond because of changes in names or in which taxa are included. However, if a translation table exists, I get the following message -- which is similar, but has a much happier outcome (i.e., the tree gets parsed): A block of trees has been read for which no corresponding block of taxa is available; a new block of taxa has been created for it. If you had expected that the trees would have applied to an existing block of taxa, it is possible that the taxa no longer correspond because of changes in names or in which taxa are included. How is it that in one case a new block of taxa is created, but in the other case "no block" could be created? Is there a workaround (e.g. a preferences flag?) that we can use so that Mesquite will parse MrBayes tree files without taxon blocks? thanks, Bill |