Re: [Treebase-devel] [PhyloWS] Re: [Nexml-discuss] CDAO term inclusion community process

[Rutger V. <rv...@in...>]

> You mean in NeXML? You could, using CDAO terms will be preferred if
> available, because they will better support inferencing.
>
> I.e., querying with PhyloWS-vocabulary terms does not and should not
> imply that you get back only results that have PhyloWS-vocabulary
> annotations. It is up to the implementing server to determine which
> data and annotation attributes to match a particular PhyloWS-
> vocabulary term with.

I see, so we could do something like (warning, pseudocode coming up):

select * where pws.label='MyTree'

...and the service could decide that a nexml tree with @label='MyTree'
constitutes a match (as could other fields, attributes or annotations,
potentially).

>> Fine by me, but I guess we need to come up with a way to collect
>> those terms, no? Would it make sense to just have a google excel
>> sheet or something to put them in?
>
> Sure, that's a good idea - go ahead, and we can add columns for
> comments, etc.

Alright, Val and I identified some fields, so I'll start with those.



-- 
Dr. Rutger A. Vos
Department of zoology
University of British Columbia
http://www.nexml.org
http://rutgervos.blogspot.com