Re: [Treebase-devel] [Nexml-discuss] CDAO term inclusion community process

[Hilmar L. <hl...@du...>]

On Jun 6, 2009, at 3:57 PM, Rutger Vos wrote:

>> I think that's a good starting point but the way I'm thinking about
>> this at present the "standard" context set (i.e., vocabulary) for
>> PhyloWS finder queries would be informed by (and possibly directly
>> import from) CDAO, but would not be CDAO itself but rather a separate
>> compact vocabulary.
>
> So we're going to have xmlns:pws="http://www.phylows.org#"  
> property="pws:taxonUID"?

You mean in NeXML? You could, using CDAO terms will be preferred if  
available, because they will better support inferencing.

I.e., querying with PhyloWS-vocabulary terms does not and should not  
imply that you get back only results that have PhyloWS-vocabulary  
annotations. It is up to the implementing server to determine which  
data and annotation attributes to match a particular PhyloWS- 
vocabulary term with.

> Fine by me, but I guess we need to come up with a way to collect  
> those terms, no? Would it make sense to just have a google excel  
> sheet or something to put them in?

Sure, that's a good idea - go ahead, and we can add columns for  
comments, etc.

	-hilmar

-- 
===========================================================
: Hilmar Lapp  -:-  Durham, NC  -:- hlapp at duke dot edu :
===========================================================