From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-04-28 21:05:25
|
Bugs item #2776454, was opened at 2009-04-20 12:35 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mjdominus You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126676&aid=2776454&group_id=248804 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: data Group: None Status: Open >Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Mark Dominus (mjdominus) Assigned to: Rutger Vos (rvos) Summary: Four unimported citations Initial Comment: MJD -> BP: There are four studies whose citations have not yet been imported. These are the citations for studies S9x6x96c10c10c17 S451 S801 S914 The reason is that the citation dump file you sent specifies citation types "Thesis", "Thesis", "Electronic Source", and "Conference Proceedings", respectively. But our data model has (at present) only citations of types "Journal Article", "Book", and "Book Section". Rutger quite properly had the citation data importer ignore citations of unknown types. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Dominus (mjdominus) Date: 2009-04-20 14:36 Message: BP says: My sense is that "Thesis" and "Electronic Source" can be squeezed into "Book"; and "Conference Proceedings" can be squeezed into "Book Section" -- we can do that for now just to accommodate these cases. But a future "new feature" might be to expand the repertoire of our publication categories -- but definitely only for down the road. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126676&aid=2776454&group_id=248804 |