|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-04-28 08:41:40
|
Bugs item #2782687, was opened at 2009-04-28 08:41 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by rvos You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126676&aid=2782687&group_id=248804 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: ui Group: piel Status: Open Priority: 4 Private: No Submitted By: Rutger Vos (rvos) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: confusing semantics for book sections vs. articles Initial Comment: > • When entering a book citation, the user is presented with a field for > "title of citation" and a field for "title of book". What's the difference? > When entering a book section citation, the user is presented with a field > for "title of citation", "book section", and "book title" -- again, "title > of citation" is redundant with "book section title", but at least in this > case entering in either box seems to fill the same field. My guess is that > the correct behavior should be the following: > Journal: > Citation Title -> title_field > Journal -> journal_field > Book: > Book Title -> title_field > Book Section: > Section Title -> title_field > Book Title -> secondary_title_field > In other words, we should not have redundant entry points for "title of > citation" and either ("book title" or "section title"). Also, in each case > the title_field gets filled, in one case the article title, another the book > title, and the third the section title. Do I have this field usage correct, > or am I mistaken? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126676&aid=2782687&group_id=248804 |