Menu
▾
▴
- translation-i18n
- translation-team-bn
- translation-team-de
- translation-team-el
- translation-team-eo
- translation-team-eu
- translation-team-fa
- translation-team-fi
- translation-team-hu
- translation-team-hy
- translation-team-ia
- translation-team-id
- translation-team-is
- translation-team-ja
- translation-team-ka
- translation-team-lv
- translation-team-ms
- translation-team-mt
- translation-team-or
- translation-team-pl
- translation-team-ro
- translation-team-rw
- translation-team-sl
- translation-team-sq
- translation-team-th
- translation-team-uk
- translation-team-vi
- translation-team-wo
- translation-team-zh-cn
translation-i18n
|
From: Vladimir 'φ-coder/p. S. <ph...@gm...> - 2012-03-30 17:59:26
Attachments:
signature.asc
|
Latest a2ps release dates to 2007. Its apparent homepage is at http://www.inf.enst.fr/~demaille/a2ps/ but both mailing list archive and VCS are 404. On the other hand the last translation update for it dates from just a week ago. What are the criterea for obsoleting? Usage? Upstream activity? POT updates? PO updates? I've made a small statistics of last PO/POT updates per domain and the longest not updated domains are: by PO update (last update before 2010): sp:"PO-Revision-Date: 2004-05-10 08:00-0500\n" unicode-han-translation:"PO-Revision-Date: 2005-04-04 10:55-0700\n" lifelines:"PO-Revision-Date: 2007-10-17 16:33+0200\n" vice:"PO-Revision-Date: 2008-06-11 11:57+0200\n" rosegarden:"PO-Revision-Date: 2008-11-12 20:21+0100\n" hylafax:"PO-Revision-Date: 2009-09-19 17:23+0930\n" gnubiff:"PO-Revision-Date: 2009-11-26 10:00+0700\n" lprng:"PO-Revision-Date: 2009-11-26 13:00+0700\n" gramadoir:"PO-Revision-Date: 2009-12-08 14:52+0000\n" by POT update (last update before 2009): m4:"POT-Creation-Date: 2000-01-10 05:27+0100\n" recode:"POT-Creation-Date: 2001-01-02 22:35+0100\n" sp:"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-09-03 15:12+0000\n" unicode-translation:"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-12-29 20:25-0500\n" unicode-han-translation:"POT-Creation-Date: 2004-04-01 18:24-0500\n" bibshelf:"POT-Creation-Date: 2005-02-15 15:08+0100\n" gip:"POT-Creation-Date: 2005-05-20 20:08+0200\n" skencil:"POT-Creation-Date: 2005-06-19 01:19+ZONE\n" gliv:"POT-Creation-Date: 2006-06-11 16:49+0200\n" doodle:"POT-Creation-Date: 2007-01-02 21:51-0700\n" jwhois:"POT-Creation-Date: 2007-02-14 14:08+0530\n" lifelines:"POT-Creation-Date: 2007-07-06 17:45-0400\n" lprng:"POT-Creation-Date: 2007-08-08 11:08+1000\n" keytouch-keyboard-bin:"POT-Creation-Date: 2007-09-29 18:23+0200\n" keytouch:"POT-Creation-Date: 2007-09-29 18:27+0200\n" minicom:"POT-Creation-Date: 2007-10-07 19:21+0200\n" libiconv:"POT-Creation-Date: 2007-10-25 00:19+0200\n" hylafax:"POT-Creation-Date: 2007-10-27 22:29-0400\n" a2ps:"POT-Creation-Date: 2007-12-29 11:28+0800\n" indent:"POT-Creation-Date: 2008-03-11 19:55+0100\n" keytouch-editor:"POT-Creation-Date: 2008-03-16 20:00+0100\n" gtkorphan:"POT-Creation-Date: 2008-04-15 18:58+0200\n" dialog:"POT-Creation-Date: 2008-06-18 18:26-0400\n" wastesedge:"POT-Creation-Date: 2008-06-29 11:56+0200\n" gpsdrive:"POT-Creation-Date: 2008-07-06 16:33+0200\n" libgpewidget:"POT-Creation-Date: 2008-07-11 13:00+0200\n" gramadoir:"POT-Creation-Date: 2008-08-17 12:05-0500\n" leafpad:"POT-Creation-Date: 2008-09-03 21:17+0900\n" texinfo:"POT-Creation-Date: 2008-09-18 20:38+0200\n" libgpg-error:"POT-Creation-Date: 2008-11-12 14:44+0100\n" vice:"POT-Creation-Date: 2008-12-15 21:20+0100\n" radius:"POT-Creation-Date: 2008-12-16 14:18+0200\n" dink:"POT-Creation-Date: 2008-12-16 21:52+0100\n" -- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko |
|
From: David P. <da...@ti...> - 2012-03-30 18:57:41
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Le 30/03/2012 13:59, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko a écrit : > What are the criterea for obsoleting? Usage? > Upstream activity? POT updates? PO updates? Why should we obsolete files? Keeping translations in a centralized and easy to find place could be handy to dig into them, and reuse (if copyright allows it) in other places. Regards David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPdgIbAAoJELgqIXr9/gny2pEQALYwKWiVsoQTsCn9nG6QGNS4 1ji2GkWU3WNYLgIG+brBMucF8IhtBcNfGh/Ck+XnZEAFRadF5/C47Zx9uQxO3VlQ vUVPwc3j3eCS1aenB9Ugs4NcbnqZO6Va/iR+wjG7M6Xa0rSaIkUFW4mJAnDhtBp6 UTZckvOWiklQUtPy7bN81wG/BU/xSvzIYgkK+Jq8uqW4L9Mub0ONXNwkitho9RAi 0KhYyxk9NX9QwrXtjhNhzgsLEhR80aj8gxLyQCpK0W2+6WulqCSPA/9gBZx3Qhj0 +2i3kqN6aGT8RH0kgtF5SJ0nuD8DQbZ+E2XCvB/sedbgsPubXsmnUpPVxQrisaIe JpQw5o6uQ+Ts+MCQO1PQzkI6vuCW+cRa1bDdxk2QxcvmOlJreYgZUseIJy4alB8E mx27QQ/Jv9M32hdhWJmTcHiZvbP/DXYlC5nJKzwagdfXn7YPS/WZbhpTXnUU6vHg wO7eggot8NFqcLdi4hRh/HkxRF/kEunzJu6dnNz1SSqvEYMDk9sXZjABs+b1nS7T jINQ+rJzSBkZEpVrBGyZ4Gys55d0YGAXVKu6yGgJRh4BJ5haRgeBqrYHDhHsnidP vKbTrZuvMAGuWWg2DOotxp7cIvf4ydQ4mRRziUQvXb2fIFajb3Yge0CSrVp7FrmI wWbxgTT5pci8fRmCkM8W =gmQN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Vladimir 'φ-coder/p. S. <ph...@gm...> - 2012-03-30 19:04:03
Attachments:
signature.asc
|
On 30.03.2012 20:57, David Prévot wrote: > Le 30/03/2012 13:59, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko a écrit : > > > What are the criterea for obsoleting? Usage? > > Upstream activity? POT updates? PO updates? > > Why should we obsolete files? Keeping translations in a centralized and > easy to find place could be handy to dig into them, and reuse (if > copyright allows it) in other places. > I see and I agree. It's that some of such files are in legacy encodings and/or have old team e-mail, sometimes more serious problems, and, at least, Ukrainian team was unwilling to fix it despite that I have provided a script for it citing the reasons like that devs dislike such updates and it's useless to do it. -- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko |
|
From: Erwin P. <erw...@gm...> - 2012-04-05 18:36:50
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 PO files are only made obsolete in rare cases, mostly if they contain just a few translated strings, and they are not maintained for a long period and the translation team is inactive. Even the 'obsolete' files can still be accessed. Erwin coordinator TP Op 30-03-12 20:57, David Prévot schreef: > Le 30/03/2012 13:59, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko a écrit : > > > What are the criterea for obsoleting? Usage? > > Upstream activity? POT updates? PO updates? > > Why should we obsolete files? Keeping translations in a centralized and > easy to find place could be handy to dig into them, and reuse (if > copyright allows it) in other places. > > Regards > > David > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF email is sponsosred by: > Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure > _______________________________________________ > Translation-i18n mailing list > Tra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translation-i18n -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPfeY2AAoJEFiYkynlFbrpq/4H/A5H3diTIWbrU+t3DyWiltWq 3rjhKSAkO0OWfHn6vZZZM5NDhboRtp3G4fo1Uf3q9dFoe7En7bpx6KCsF3YC5eSP snxVkc989cdH353VjhwuGwPMAyqEC+Aa/NLHsBpXhvDmmUa4NaQSpLM1fnhgxrVm 8cyxHmj2jMubE3fmzma81iT8uxPyWpDiX+i8nvhY7rPQL+ohpDZmV5WPAMGuesWs 18/OdRsTpYrqbyv52L8H5NsOJDgK1ltcMB9fpXnCH7VrMYPIc+yJUSF7fzXCi2Wf 3tZCNfxhZ9N0/8J6CGe2CefixxxRKW7Uf3Q8coY9WJPLEyVjRYLy5KORA0ApPRc= =++RH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Vladimir 'φ-coder/p. S. <ph...@gm...> - 2012-04-05 18:49:38
Attachments:
signature.asc
|
On 05.04.2012 20:36, Erwin Poeze wrote: > > PO files are only made obsolete in rare cases, mostly if they contain > just a few translated strings, and they are not maintained for a long > period and the translation team is inactive. Even the 'obsolete' files > can still be accessed. > Ok, good policy. I'm asking a bit around if there are people interested in resurrecting Rumantsch but without much success yet. -- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko |
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X