Re: [Tracestring-devel] Possible names:

[William L. (B. B. <bb...@cf...>]

>>>>> On 14 Apr 2003 12:34:52 -0500, Robert McLay <mc...@cf...> said:

Robert> The idea behind TEMPLATE is that it would be 1 in the case of
Robert> angle brackets found in the class definition (e.g Foo<T>
Robert> versus Foo).

Can you also detect a templated function and set $TEMPLATE based on
that? Consider the following:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
template <typename T>
T& func(T t)
{
  return t;
}

template <typename T>
class Foo
{
public:
  void setA(T t);
  
private:
  T m_a;
};

template <typename T>
void Foo<T>::setA(T t)
{
  m_a = t;
}

int main()
{
  int   a;
  float b;

  a = func<int>(1);    
  b = func<float>(1.0);
  
  Foo<int>   fi;
  Foo<float> ff;

  fi.setA(a);
  ff.setA(b);
  
  return 0;
}
------------------------------------------------------------------------

ariel(616)$ ~/scratch/traceString-V0.3/traceString --name *.C
func(T t)
Foo<T>::setA(T t)
main()

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Would $TEMPLATE be set for the function on line 1 of the output above?
I think that it should be, but there are no '<>' anywhere in that
list. I understand that this may be hard to implement, but I thought
I'd point it out.

Bill.


P.S. I can't tell if Alfred is on the list yet are not. Let me know
when you are, Alfred, and I'll stop CC'ing you here.

-- 
Bill Barth                   |   Home: (512) 797-3045
bb...@cf...  |   Work: (512) 471-4069
Office: WRW 111              |   Fax:  (512) 232-3357