Re: [tpmdd-devel] TPM 2.0 chip in Intel NUC miniPC not works

[Jarkko S. <jar...@li...>]

On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 10:55 +0900, mipsan.K wrote:

> Hi
> 
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen
> <jar...@li...> wrote:

> > Hi
> > 
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 07:15:44PM +0900, mipsan.K wrote:

> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I send reply-mesg to Peter  only.
> > > Apologize.
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Peter Huewe <pet...@gm...>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > >     Hi
> > > 
> > >     Am 27. Oktober 2015 03:29:22 MEZ, schrieb "mipsan.K" <
> > > mi...@gm...>:
> > >     >Dear,
> > >     >
> > >     >Intel *NUC5i5MYHE *has TPM 2.0 chip from Infineon(Infineon
> > >     >*SLB9665TT2.0 *TPM
> > >     >version 2.0).
> > >     >
> > >     >I tested various kernel to activate it, however failed.
> > >     >Even linux-tpmdd(4.3-rc4) as well.
> > >     >That may support only SLB9635/9645 and not SLB9665.
> > >     >
> > >     >Any kinds of advice will be appreciated.
> > >     >
> > >     >Thanks,
> > >     >
> > >     >mipsan
> > > 
> > > 
> > >     As Jarkko said, that will be fixed in 4.4
> > >     In the meantime you can tryout the security-next tree, or my
> > > tpm tree.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Would you let me know when the 4.4 kernel is available?
> > > And, does linux-tpmdd(4.3-rc4) tree still have same problem?
> > 
> > Could you not use HTML for emails? These are pretty difficult to
> > follow
> > especially when you are using text-only email client. This the
> > second
> > time I'm asking for this.
> > 
> > To know when the next release is available you should follow
> > http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-kernel-announce
> > 
> > The fixes that you require should be in 4.4-rc1 release and you get
> > the
> > annoucement from that list.
> > 
> > In the meanwhile you can try to compile kernel from this branch:
> > https://github.com/jsakkine/linux-tpm2/tree/for-peter-v44
> > 
> > /Jarkko
> 
> Sorry for disturbing you by message format.
> 
> I changed formatting into plain text mode at GMAIL.

No worries, it's just a practice that we use here and is very common
in open source project mailing lists in general.

> I will try to build that kernel you suggested.

Alright, thank you for your effort to test this feature. Keep me posted
and we can sort out the possible issues.

> Thanks,
> 
> youngwha

/Jarkko