You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|
|
From: B. S. <ces...@re...> - 2001-03-11 19:00:11
|
Neil Conway escribi=F3: > = > On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 12:39:08AM -0800, C?sar Blanco Serrano wrote: > > 1.- Is possible to run photoshelf in a windows server? I > > mean, a windows server with postgres and a perl interpreter. > = > Well, it is technically possible, but it doesn't work at the > moment. Perl on Win32 is somewhat sketchy, and Postgres on Win32 > is (AFAIK) _not_ a recommended platform (you need to build with > cygwin and junk like that). With that in mind, no one has bothered > to make the PhotoShelf (v1) code UNIX-independant, so I would imagine > there are things like '/' hardcoded, etc. Porting to actual PS > code to Win32 wouldn't be difficult at all -- I just question > whether it's a good idea to be running PS on Win32 in the first > place. Hello again: just a comment to your answer, * Basically, I don't like microsoft products. * My question about PS and win32 is becouse at this time is obligatory for me to think in a win server. I mean: the ISP (a friend of mine) where I can put my domain/pages -totally free- works only with win32, and I cannot change this. It's a pity :-(( * I like PS and I would like to use it to make an spanish community to show/interchange pictures and experiences about photography. So I'm so interested in PS version 2 with new features: running new platforms (you know ;-)) and multilingual support (you know I can help with translations into spanish). I can contribute with more ideas and features for PS... See you... -- = -------------------------- Cesar Blanco Serrano ces...@re... POWERED BY LINUX |
|
From: Neil C. <nc...@kl...> - 2001-03-10 02:23:57
|
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 12:39:08AM -0800, C?sar Blanco Serrano wrote: > 1.- Is possible to run photoshelf in a windows server? I > mean, a windows server with postgres and a perl interpreter. Well, it is technically possible, but it doesn't work at the moment. Perl on Win32 is somewhat sketchy, and Postgres on Win32 is (AFAIK) _not_ a recommended platform (you need to build with cygwin and junk like that). With that in mind, no one has bothered to make the PhotoShelf (v1) code UNIX-independant, so I would imagine there are things like '/' hardcoded, etc. Porting to actual PS code to Win32 wouldn't be difficult at all -- I just question whether it's a good idea to be running PS on Win32 in the first place. > 2.- At this moment, thinking in new version of this script, > Is a good idea planning diferent language versions? I could > help with the spanish translation. Yes, it's probably good to do multi-lingualization. I've never really done it, so I can't suggest any technical details, but it would be a good thing to have, provided it's technically feasible (what is the state of Unicode in Perl 5.6?). Your offer of help is appreciated -- thanks. Cheers, Neil part-time PhotoShelf helper, overworked stressed-out student ;-) -- Neil Conway <nei...@ho...> Get my GnuPG key from: http://klamath.dyndns.org/mykey.asc Encrypted mail welcomed If one really is a superior person, the fact is likely to leak out without too much assistance. -- John Andrew Homes |
|
From: Neil C. <nc...@kl...> - 2001-02-25 04:40:02
|
Hi everyone, There is some good news and some bad news. The bad news is that I've been tied up with more Real Life stuff this week, and I haven't been able to get as much done on 0.3 as I would have liked. The good news is that this weekend I finally sat down and started the XML code. It's in the CVS version of XMLReader.java, if you're curious. I've been hacking on it for most of today, and large parts of it are working. There are still a couple issues to work out, however -- but I should have them fixed fairly soon. During the past week or so I've also had time to fix the issues with the unit testing stuff, and rewrite the unit tests for Request so that they actually work (thanks to a guy from my local XP users group for knocking some sense into me). I also checked in some more minor javadoc improvements, include brief 'package-level' documentation (will be improved by 0.4). AFAICT the rest of the stuff that needed to be done for 0.3 has been done: all that is left is finishing the XML code, updating the user documentation, and a few 'house cleaning' items. So I should be able to release 0.3 fairly soon. I've attached the current TODO list from CVS -- it also has a preliminary list of the improvements scheduled for 0.3.1 As always, checkout the latest code in CVS -- there is lots of new code that needs to be tested. Cheers, Neil Lead Developer, Tornado HTTP Server -- Neil Conway <nei...@ho...> Get my GnuPG key from: http://klamath.dyndns.org/mykey.asc Encrypted mail welcomed You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true. -- Homer J. Simpson |
|
From: Neil C. <nc...@kl...> - 2001-02-18 21:10:21
|
Hi all, I've been really busy with Real Life stuff for the past week, and I hardly got any time to work on any Tornado-related stuff. Yesterday I checked in the rest of the javadoc updates, and fixed Tornado so it starts up properly. Today I've been working on getting the CLF date format correct -- Java's date classes are slowly driving me insane ;-) I've got it 95% correct now, and I'll fix the other minor issues before I release 0.3.0 I haven't started the XML stuff yet, which is the only 'big' thing left to be done before 0.3 -- I'll probably get that started today, but it will take a little while. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <nei...@ho...> Get my GnuPG key from: http://klamath.dyndns.org/mykey.asc Encrypted mail welcomed I am not interested in the past. I am interested in the future for that is where I intend to spend the rest of my life. -- Charles F. Ketterring |
|
From: Neil C. <nc...@kl...> - 2001-02-11 00:19:22
|
Hi everyone, I just thought I'd update you on the most recent changes to the code in CVS). This morning I went through a lot of code and wrote javadoc for it, so the documentation should be considerably better. I still have some more classes to do (see 'TODO'), but help is welcome: if you're looking for an easy thing to do to help out, contributing documentation or fixing grammar mistakes is really easy. I should have the access log date format fixed by the end of the weekend. I've been scratching my head over this for a while, but I think I've got it figured out now. I split HTTPDateMaker and CLFDateMaker into separate classes, which should make the code more robust, and will allow the CLF date format fixes when I get around to them. BTW, does anyone of a document with the exact specification of the Common Log Format (CLF)? I couldn't find one that looks authoritative. The other thing that needs to be done before 0.3.0 is the XML config system. I've refactored the code so that this should be fairly easy, but I haven't actually written the XML parsing code yet. el...@xs... contributed a lot of code towards this, which should be helpful when I start work. This should be finished by the end of the week. So that's all that really needs to be done for 0.3.0. I'll attach the 'TODO' file so you can see the rest of the stuff on the horizon, as well as the CHANGES file from CVS so you can see what stuff I've already improved -- there are lots of changes since 0.2.1: the source tree has been re-organized, split into 3 packages instead of just 1, there have been tons of minor cleanups and improvements, and several bugs fixed. BTW, I'm aware that the current code in CVS compiles, but it doesn't work properly (i.e. it throws an exception on startup). I'm aware of this, so don't worry about it -- it's because the XML stuff is half-complete, and some stub methods are being called. This will be fixed soon. Email me or the list if you have any problems. Cheers, Neil Lead Developer, Tornado HTTP Server -- Neil Conway <nei...@ho...> Get my GnuPG key from: http://klamath.dyndns.org/mykey.asc Encrypted mail welcomed Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good, you'll have to ram them down people's throats. -- Howard Aiken |