[Tockit-general] AW: JabRef and Conceptual Knowledge Processing

[<web...@pe...>]

[cced to Tockit mailing list]



Hi Joerg and others,



I'm open to such ideas (esp. since I use JabRef myself), but I can't
promise to put much time into such a project in the next future. On the
other hand integration would probably really be quite easy, the only
problem would be the size increase -- Docco is still based on a full copy
of our ToscanaJ tool and requires the Lucene indexing engine. But I think
it would be easy to model something as a plugin, we use a simple plugin
infrastructure anyway.



The main question I'd raise is what the extra functionality would look
like. What makes an integration better than just running Docco on the same
directory, but as a separate program? With a use case or two it would be
easier to create some estimate of the effort involved in implementing it.



Cheers,

  Peter





 --- Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht --- 

Datum: 09.05.2005 15:03

Von: "Joerg K. Wegner" <we...@in...>

An: jab...@li..., pet...@us...,
mo...@bo...

Betreff: JabRef and Conceptual Knowledge Processing

  

> Hi all,

> Dear administrators,

> 

> might anyone be interested to implement a marriage between 'content 

> management'

> 

> http://tockit.sourceforge.net/docco/index.html

> http://tockit.sourceforge.net/tockit/index.html

> 

> and literature management:

> 

> http://jabref.sourceforge.net/

> 

> Especially with the PDF-directory in Jabref it should not be a big deal


> to add Docco-plugin to JabRef. I use both tools seperately and I can 

> tell you that the fulltext search in Docco is amazingly, especially 

> together with the visualization tool.

> 

> Kind regards, Joerg

> -- 

> Dipl. Chem. Joerg K. Wegner

> Center of Bioinformatics Tuebingen (ZBIT)

> Department of Computer Architecture

> Univ. Tuebingen, Sand 1, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany

> Phone: (+49/0) 7071 29 78970

> Fax: (+49/0) 7071 29 5091

> E-Mail: mailto:we...@in...

> WWW:    http://www-ra.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de

> --

> Never mistake motion for action.

>                                      (E. Hemingway)

> 

> Never mistake action for meaningful action.

>                                 (Hugo Kubinyi,2004)

> 

> 

>