Hi Martin,
I'm currently working through the interfaces, putting in vetoable
notifications for all topic map object properties - this will help me
complete Annex F conformance and will provide an additional useful hook for
schema validation and for GUIs. Sorry about the state of the CVS tree - I
must have missed out some files in my last commit as the main TM4J build
("all") compiles cleanly on my machine...
Unfortunately, there is no way to get round this problem without access to
the source of the PropertyVetoException class (if the exception was in the
org.tm4j codebase, you could have changed it to be derived from
RuntimeException).
I still have more work to do on the vetoable notifications, so hopefully I
should be able to fix up the CVS build soon.
Cheers,
Kal
At 22:27 05/04/2002 +0200, Martin Stockhammer wrote:
>Hi Kal,
>
>i tried the index interface and it seems to work! Really great :-)
>I have tried only the AssociatonTypesIndex now.
>
>To compile the CVS-Tree I had to add a lot of "try {} catch
>(PropertyVetoException ex) {}" stuff, because the compiler complained
>about uncatched exceptions.
>Is it possible to tell the compiler to ignore such uncatched exceptions?
>
>Bye
>
>Martin Stockhammer
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tm4j-users mailing list
>Tm4...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tm4j-users
>
|
