From: George T. <geo...@fr...> - 2005-05-12 19:37:18
|
Thank you Lars Definitely I'll take a look in these Cheers ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lars Heuer" <he...@se...> To: "George Tryfon" <geo...@fr...> Cc: <tm4...@li...> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 4:56 PM Subject: Re: [TM4J-users] use of rmi? > Hi George, > > > Are there any thought on passing TMAPI through RMI or... web servicess? > > Is anybody else things it would be a nice thing? > > I wouldn't go the way to pass TMAPI through RMI. > > I think it's better to exchange Topic Map Fragments in some dialect. > A begin might be Ontopias TMRAP or SNAPI > <http://sf.net/projects/snapi/>. > SNAPI's approach is nice, but the development seems to be stalled. > TMRAP is very simple and should be easily translatable from the TM4J > API to TMAPI. > <http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/tm4j/tm4web/tmrap/> > > Another, more advanced way would be adapting the NetworkedPlanet WS. > <http://www.networkedplanet.com/technology/webservices/intro.html> > > The service interface is very similiar to TMAPI methods so it would be > easily translatable to TMAPI. > > BTW: If you translate TMRAP to TMAPI, the TMAPI-Utils > <http://sf.net/projects/tmapi-utils/> project would be glad if you > contribute your code to the project. :) > > Best regards, > Lars > -- > http://semagia.com > ____________________________________________________________________ http://www.freemail.gr - äùñåÜí õðçñåóßá çëåêôñïíéêïý ôá÷õäñïìåßïõ. http://www.freemail.gr - free email service for the Greek-speaking. |