RE: [TM4J-users] sequence of loading two files

[Kal A. <ka...@te...>]

Hi Rich,

I've had a look into this and not quite figured out whats going wrong. If
both topic maps have an xml:base attribute specified, the XTMBuilder seems
to do the right thing and put the fragment identifiers on the xml:base
attribute value. If the topic maps do not have an xml:base attribute, then
the fragment identifiers get added to a default base URL
(http://topicmap.techquila.com/default).

Perhaps I am missing something obvious here - do you have a sample of the
topic maps which cause this problem that I can have a look at ?

Cheers,

Kal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tm4...@li...
> [mailto:tm4...@li...]On Behalf Of Richard
> Watson
> Sent: 14 June 2001 21:58
> To: TM4J Users
> Subject: [TM4J-users] sequence of loading two files
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm getting a bit better at this stuff and things are working nicely. :)
>
> I've found something that looks a bit suspicious:
>
> File "A.xml" and file "B.xml"
> File A.xml has an association between #n and #m, both in A.xml.
> Both files have correct bases set.
> I load both into the same TopicMap using the XTMBuilder.
>
> Now...two cases:
> If I load A.xml into the builder and then B.xml, the association will load
> fine.
>
> If I load B first, then the topicRefs in the association must be "A.xml#n"
> and "A.xml#m", or they end up with resourcerefs "B.xml#n" and "B.xml#m".
>
> This a bug?
>
> Non-codey question of the day: where are you guys geographically?
>
> Cheers,
> Rich
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tm4j-users mailing list
> Tm4...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tm4j-users
>
>