From: Kal A. <ka...@te...> - 2001-06-15 08:47:42
|
Hi Rich, > Hi all, > > I'm getting a bit better at this stuff and things are working nicely. :) > > I've found something that looks a bit suspicious: > > File "A.xml" and file "B.xml" > File A.xml has an association between #n and #m, both in A.xml. > Both files have correct bases set. > I load both into the same TopicMap using the XTMBuilder. > > Now...two cases: > If I load A.xml into the builder and then B.xml, the association will load > fine. > > If I load B first, then the topicRefs in the association must be "A.xml#n" > and "A.xml#m", or they end up with resourcerefs "B.xml#n" and "B.xml#m". > > This a bug? > It certainly looks like one - my guess is that it is a problem with XTMBuilder's algorithm for expanding fragment IDs and partial URLs - I'll have a look at that today. > Non-codey question of the day: where are you guys geographically? > I'm in London, enjoying our summer (both days of it ;-) Cheers, Kal |