[Tm4j-developers] Panckoucke

[George T. <geo...@fr...>]

Hello Panckoucke developers
I would like to share some thoughts I have.

I am thinking of an AModel implementation witch:

instead of calls like:
AMNode createNode(String label,Object RepresentedObject,AMGestalt
gestalt);

should have calls like:
public AMNode createNode(Object representedObject,AMGestalt gestalt);

the AMNode should derive the "label" from the representedObject

also:
I thing that the AMNode could have closer relation to the Abstractor that
came from
(It could be customized by the Abstractor) and so:
Adding or removing AMNode(s) or AMArc(s) into a specific AMMember,
if this AMMember knows the architecture that represents, could call
Abstractor and change the "Topic Map" itself

There is another big advandage, if we are able to return from the AModel
into the Abstractor.

We could "Refresh" our AModel and make it "Up to date" with the "Topic Map",
if Topic Map changes.

And ofcource could implement listeners that listen changes in Topic Map in
inform the AModel, or AMMember

Cheers
Giorgos

ps.
because I don't see any public discussions, on Panckoucke development,
I would like to ask you about your "time schedule" for Panckoucke.
Our editor "ATop" is now "Open source" in sourceforge (no binaries yet),
ready to implement editing of Topic Maps, and I am eager to see Panckoucke
moving




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.767 / Virus Database: 514 - Release Date: 21/9/2004


____________________________________________________________________
http://www.freemail.gr - δωρεάν υπηρεσία ηλεκτρονικού ταχυδρομείου.
http://www.freemail.gr - free email service for the Greek-speaking.