Re: [Tm4j-developers] Panckoucke package names

[Kal A. <ka...@te...>]

Hi Cristoph,

I agree with moving the core and api packages up to org.tm4j.panckoucke
- that matches the package structure for TM4J as well so it keeps
everything nicely consistent.

Cheers,

Kal

On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 08:47, Christoph Froehlich wrote:
> Hi panckoucke-developers
> 
> currently the panckoucke code is organised in three main branches:
> [1] org.tm4j.panckoucke.core
> [2] org.tm4j.panckoucke.api
> [3] org.tm4j.panckoucke.impl
> 
> [1] and [2] contain the public api, mostly interfaces , while [3]
> contains the concrete implementation. 
> 
> The difference between [1] and [2] has historical reasons and does not
> make any sense at all. Therefore I would like to combine [1] and [2]
> into one branch before the first non-development release of panckoucke.
>  
> Regarding the naming, I see two options:
> [a] shift all classes in [1] and [2] one level up, which means that we
> get rid of both "api" as well as "core".
> [b] use org.tm4j.panckoucke.api
> 
> I tend to favour [a] but I would be glad to hear what others think.
> 
> Actually implementing the change means that *any* app that currently
> uses panckoucke will be broken and must be refactored in order to
> reflect the new package structure.
> 
> If anyone objects, please raise your hand. 
> 
> bye 
> c
> 
>  
-- 
Kal Ahmed <ka...@te...>
techquila