Re: [Tm4j-developers] tolog implementation ?

[Kal A. <ka...@te...>]

Nope, its partially functional. I've implemented most of the Tolog=20
language[1]. The pieces currently not implemented are alternatives, the n=
ot()=20
operator and the count() operator. This implementation also supports your=
 own=20
pluggable operators so you can take complex or non-standard operations an=
d=20
implement them in Java and then use them from Tolog.

Anybody who feels brave enough to have a play can look at the test progra=
m for=20
some simple examples and at the Ontopia tutorial on Tolog [1].

Cheers,

Kal

[1] http://www.ontopia.net/omnigator/docs/query/tutorial.html

On Tuesday 07 May 2002 08:50, Gerd Mueller wrote:
> Hi Kal,
>
> I noticed that you've checked something in what looks like a Tolog
> interpreter. Is it really a working Tolog-implementation or only the pa=
rser
> ?
>
> bye,
> gerd
>
> _______________________________________________________________________=
____
>___ Gerd Mueller                                                =20
> ge...@sm... SMB GmbH                                              =
=20
> http://www.smb-tec.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We sup=
ply
> the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: bandwidth@sourceforge.=
net
> _______________________________________________
> Tm4j-developers mailing list
> Tm4...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tm4j-developers

--=20
Kal Ahmed, techquila.com
XML and Topic Map Consultancy

e: ka...@te...
p: +44 7968 529531
w: www.techquila.com