From: Jack P. <jac...@th...> - 2002-02-27 21:41:43
|
I think that "web sites as topic maps" is a great idea. In fact, I've been= =20 thinking about ways to break the entire XML Topic Maps book into a topic=20 map itself on the web. These images give me some ideas. Thanks. Jack At 11:55 AM 2/27/2002 +0100, Gerd Mueller wrote: >On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 00:25:04 +0100 >"Florian G. Haas" <f.g...@gm...> wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > as I'm sure most of you are aware, we (Thomas Bauer, to a major extent,= and > > Florian Haas, to a minor one) have put some thought into a possible > > re-design of the TM4J project web site. We have completed some design=20 > drafts > > and would greatly appreciate your comments. > > > > OK, so we (plus Kal) thought about making the project web site design= much > > more Topic-Map-ish, so we could eventually use it for a Velocity- or > > Cocoon-centered application. What we have for now are Photoshop dummies > > (we're working on HTML versions), and please feel free to look at them= at > > http://tm4j.org/tmp/HP_DESIGN_9_WEB.JPG and > > http://tm4j.org/tmp/HP_DESIGN_9FLORIAN_WEB.JPG (just two versions of the > > same thing with different "topics"), and let us hear your thoughts. > > Christoph Fr=F6hlich has already provided some very valuable feedback in= an > > E-Mail to Kal, which we've attached to this message. Christoph, if= you're > > monitoring this list, we hope you don't mind our doing this. Please keep > > telling us stuff like this, it's really more than helpful. > > > > Some other issues that have already come up in informal discussion: > > * Keep the "newsticker"? Or is it just a confusing attention-catcher? > > * Keep the "search" box? It would certainly be nice to have a full-text > > topic map search (or even TMQL, or Tolog), but how would we implement= it? > > > > Let's hope we get some good discussion going about this! :-) > >I like the overall design. It's frugal but very distinctive. > >But I agree with Christoph that the 'a topic map >engine for java' line in the header is to much. Also the shadow of >'topic maps 4 java' is to heavy. Perhaps you should drop the 'topic maps=20 >for java' >from the TM4J logo and leave 'topic maps 4 java'. > >The navgation bar doesn't stand out enough. So you have to search for at=20 >first. >I would suggest another background color for it and maybe we should also=20 >move it >to left side. > >Also I think the newsticker isn't necessary if we have the 'news' box. > >I would also drop the 'optimized for explorer' hint. The site should work= for >all browsers in the same quality. > >Best Regards, >Gerd > >___________________________________________________________________________= ___ >Gerd=20 >Mueller ge...@sm... >SMB GmbH = http://www.smb-tec.com > >_______________________________________________ >Tm4j-developers mailing list >Tm4...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tm4j-developers |