From: Jack P. <jac...@th...> - 2002-02-09 19:58:16
|
I think putting revised style sheets in CVS makes sense. +1 for that. Jack At 06:59 PM 2/9/2002 +0000, Kal Ahmed wrote: >Hi Folks, > >Currently the CVS tree contains the Docbook DTD, but *not* the >stylesheets. I feel that uploading and then maintaining this in CVS would >be too much of an administrative overhead and that it would be easier to >simply point people who want to build the documentation for themselves to >the appropriate page to download the stylesheets. However, there is also >an argument for making it possible to build everything with a clean >checkout from CVS (which is currently not possible if the stylesheets are >missing). I also found that I needed to fix a (very minor) bug with one of >the XSL files to get it to work with SAXON - so that is possibly another >good reason for maintaining our own set of "approved" stylesheets in CVS. > >What do we want to do: > >1) Add the stylesheets to CVS >2) Keep things as they are but add some documentation (to a README ?) >telling people where to get the Docbook stylesheets. > >I'd like to hear your opinions... > >Cheers, > >Kal > >_______________________________________________ >Tm4j-developers mailing list >Tm4...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tm4j-developers |