Re [Tm4j-developers] TMNav status

[gautham k. <gka...@re...>]

I vote +1 for this proposal of removing TMNav from the TM4J and putting it =
up as a seperate project.=0D=0ARegds=0D=0ALupo=0D=0A=0D=0AOn Sat, 05 Jan 20=
02 Kal Ahmed wrote :=0D=0A> Hi again!=0D=0A> =0D=0A> I would just like to e=
xplain why I am proposing to =0D=0A> remove TMNav from the =0D=0A> main TM4=
J distribution. Basically, it is my feeling =0D=0A> that the application =
=0D=0A> needs a complete ground-up rewrite - this is quite a =0D=0A> big ta=
sk and I don't =0D=0A> want to hold up releases of TM4J while this happens.=
 =0D=0A> Reasons for needing a =0D=0A> rewrite include=0D=0A> =0D=0A> 1) Th=
e major changes to the TM4J API mean that some =0D=0A> things in TMNav coul=
d =0D=0A> be done more efficiently=0D=0A> 2) TMNav never supported multiple=
 backends=0D=0A> 3) TheBrain SDK is no longer freely downloadable, so a =0D=
=0A> new visualisation is =0D=0A> needed=0D=0A> 4) The interfaces of TMNav =
need reworking to support =0D=0A> pluggable UI elements.=0D=0A> =0D=0A> How=
 do you all feel about making TMNav a separate =0D=0A> project ? It could s=
till =0D=0A> be hosted under the TM4J SourceForge project but should =0D=0A=
> probably have its =0D=0A> own CVS module and its own separate release pac=
kages.=0D=0A> =0D=0A> Cheers,=0D=0A> =0D=0A> Kal=0D=0A> =0D=0A> =0D=0A> ___=
____________________________________________=0D=0A> Tm4j-developers mailing=
 list=0D=0A> Tm4...@li...=0D=0A> https://lists.sou=
rceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tm4j-develo-=0D=0A> pers=0D=0A =0A