RE: [Tm4j-developers] Checking in

[Kal A. <ka...@te...>]

Hi Gerd,

Those changes seem fine to me - feel free to check your stuff in.

Cheers,

Kal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tm4...@li...
> [mailto:tm4...@li...]On Behalf Of Gerd
> Mueller
> Sent: 28 May 2001 19:12
> To: tm4...@li...
> Subject: [Tm4j-developers] Checking in
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm about to check in the ozone stuff. Before I'll do this some
> remarks/questions:
> 
> 1. My build script seems to be obsolete since the bin/ant does everything
>    that is needed.
> 
> 2. The XTMBuilder had two small bugs: somewhere the *Impl objects
>    where created directly with 'new' instead with the factory.
> 
> 3. I had to make the constructors of TopicNotFoundException and
>    DuplicateTopicException public since otherwise I can't use 
>    them.
> 
> 4. To make the ozone implementation work I had to make TopicMapObjectImpl
>    'Serializable'. This is needed since method arguments of ozone
>    object methods are serialized and there are some util methods that
>    get a transient TopicMapObjectImpl, e.g. the search methods.
> 
> If you don't mind I would check in the whole stuff.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Gerd
> 
> --
> ________________________________________________________________
> Gerd Mueller                                    ge...@sm...     
> SMB GmbH                                  http://www.smb-tec.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tm4j-developers mailing list
> Tm4...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tm4j-developers
> 
>