[Tipxd-devel] Re: patch to compile on freebsd 3.x (fwd)
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
thomash
From: Roman S. <ro...@xp...> - 2000-03-12 14:53:59
|
forwarded :) --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 16:14:43 -0800 From: Thomas Hendrick <th...@qu...> To: Roman Shterenzon <ro...@xp...> Subject: Re: patch to compile on freebsd 3.x I thought about this. You might wanna post this to the mailing list, though. For archive purposes. =) To answer your question, I for some reason thought popt was the more portable, though getopt is the older. popt has some nice features, like automatic generation of usage and help options and some nice output. WE can discuss this further on the mailing list. I'm just trying to reply to these before I leave work. =) -Tom. On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 03:15:34PM +0200, Roman Shterenzon wrote: > > Hello, > One thing that I already noticed; > popt is not a stardard while getopt is.. > It may be not problem on FreeBSD where it's in ports collection, but it > can be problem on solaris.. > Do you want me to rewrite it using getopt? > Most gnu software comes with getopt.c, getopt1.c and getopt.h which makes > it possible to use getopt_long. > What do you think? > getopt() is a part of most UNIX operating systems. > > --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant > [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] > -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Thomas Hendrick Office: 1-(858)-845-3045 AI-105C Pager : 1-(619)-557-8917 th...@qu... Mobile: 1-(619)-980-8624 No official representation of Qualcomm is implicit in the above ----------------------------------------------------------------- |