From: Jon M. <jon...@er...> - 2004-06-15 00:12:44
|
Try these two. You had not set the "domain" value in sockaddr-tipc, which embarassing enough led to a kernel crash. After one of my latest changes there was a missing check for "wild" addresses in the send code. It is now fixed and checked in. /Jon PS: If you try with SOCK_RDM instead of SOCK_DGRAM you will see your message bounce back with error code "TIPC_NO_NODE" at such types of user error, instead of just seeing it disappearing. Chris Friesen wrote: > Mark Haverkamp wrote: > >> If you have sysrq compiled in you can get a task list dump and a dump of >> what the current processor is doing (assuming its not really dead). It >> may have some clues as to what is going on. > > > Not compiled in currently, but I can add it and see if I can get more > info. > > Chris |