RE: [Tipc-discussion] REPLICA_NODES set to 1

[Mark H. <ma...@os...>]

On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 19:42, Ling, Xiaofeng wrote:
> =20
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Mark Haverkamp [mailto:ma...@os...]=20
> >Sent: 2004=E5=B9=B46=E6=9C=8811=E6=97=A5 1:22
> >To: Ling, Xiaofeng
> >Cc: tipc
> >Subject: RE: [Tipc-discussion] REPLICA_NODES set to 1
> >
> >On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 08:36, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 02:41, Ling, Xiaofeng wrote:
> >> > Yes, that's problem.The broadcast packet is not received by sender=
,
> >> > maybe we need to copy one to sender self.
> >> > how about this patch?  (The reture value still need to be resolved=
)
> >>=20
> >
> >I notice a pause between sending a multicast message and=20
> >receiving it on
> >another node that I don't see with the replicated multicast.  Do you
> >know why that might be?
> Do you mean there is a delay between=20
> sending and recevinig when using broadcast?

Yes, that is what I saw.  I have some subscription test programs running
connected to the event server on each node.  When I publish from one of
the nodes, the subscribers on all nodes are to receive the event data.=20
With the replicated multicast, I see the received event right away.=20
With broadcast there was some delay.  I haven't quantified the time
difference, just what I saw displayed on the screen.

Mark.
>=20
> >If you are interested in using an application for multicast testing, I
> >have an event service based on the SAF spec that I have been working
> >on.  It is what I have been using with TIPC.  It is still in
> >development, but it may be useful for some of your testing.   I have a=
n
> >event server, and some publish and subscribe test programs.  I have a
> >bitkeeper view at=20
> >
> >bk://bitkeeper.osdl.org/osdlcluster
> >
> >Or the latest tar at=20
> >
> >http://developer.osdl.org/cherry/osdlcluster/
>=20
> I'll try it.
--=20
Mark Haverkamp <ma...@os...>