RE: [Tipc-discussion] REPLICA_NODES set to 1

[Ling, X. <xia...@in...>]

Yes, that's problem.The broadcast packet is not received by sender,
maybe we need to copy one to sender self.
how about this patch?  (The reture value still need to be resolved)

Index: sendbcast.c
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
RCS file: /cvsroot/tipc/source/unstable/net/tipc/sendbcast.c,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -r1.18 sendbcast.c
--- sendbcast.c	2 Jun 2004 21:31:36 -0000	1.18
+++ sendbcast.c	10 Jun 2004 09:38:57 -0000
@@ -240,6 +240,9 @@
 	} else {
 		bcast_set_timer(16 * RTT);
 		check_bcast_outqueue();
+		struct sk_buff *copybuf;
+		copybuf =3D buf_clone(b);
+		bcast_port_recv(copybuf);
 		res =3D tipc_bsend_buf(b, &mc_head);
 	}
 	free_mclist(&mc_head);

>-----Original Message-----
>From: tip...@li...=20
>[mailto:tip...@li...] On Behalf=20
>Of Mark Haverkamp
>Sent: 2004=C4=EA6=D4=C210=C8=D5 6:48
>To: tipc
>Subject: [Tipc-discussion] REPLICA_NODES set to 1
>
>Just for testing, I set REPLICA_NODES to 1 to test out bcast instead of
>the replicated mcast.  I found that with the replicated sending, that
>all the nodes receive the message.  But with bcast, all nodes but the
>sending node receives.  This doesn't sound right to me.  The sending
>node should also receive bcast messages shouldn't it?
>
>Mark.
>
>--=20
>Mark Haverkamp <ma...@os...>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: GNOME Foundation
>Hackers Unite!  GUADEC: The world's #1 Open Source Desktop Event.
>GNOME Users and Developers European Conference, 28-30th June in Norway
>http://2004/guadec.org
>_______________________________________________
>TIPC-discussion mailing list
>TIP...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
>
>