From: Jon M. <jon...@er...> - 2004-05-20 17:30:05
|
This is what I meant. I can not see the relation between my changes and the multicast problem. Anyway, as long as it works I am happy. /jon Daniel McNeil wrote: On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 10:00, Jon Maloy wrote: Sounds good. Does this mean that the problem from yesterday is solved? If so, it puzzles me that this problem showed up now, after my seemingly unrelated changes, and not earlier. /jon This fixes the multicast problem. Mark is still seeing a problem when running 64 processes. Daniel |