From: Mark H. <ma...@os...> - 2004-04-29 17:00:54
|
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 08:15, Jon Maloy wrote: > Do you suggest that we delay the LKML-announcement until we have done > these changes ? To replace all the linked lists is intrusive, and it > may > take weeks re-stabilize the code. Otherwise, see my comments below. > > Regards /jon Steve Hemminger said to send to lin...@vg... also. > [...] > > Also, I think that in the long run, that the 2.4/2.6 ifdef code will > I see there is one I forgot to remove in driver.c, otherwise I think > this is already > done. I talked with a couple people here about the 2.4/2.6 code directories. They said that code submitted for review should be for 2.6 only and not have it set up for both versions of the kernel. > > -- Mark Haverkamp <ma...@os...> |