RE: [Tipc-discussion] RE: Another tipc observation

[Guo, M. <mi...@in...>]

Hi, Mark:
=20
    Do  you test the MC member > 8 ? For replication transmission,it can
work for us already in our local CVS tree, for bcastlink transmission,
it also can work in our local CVS tree. We are now debugging the
retransmission.
=20
Thanks
Guo Min


  _____ =20

	From: tip...@li...
[mailto:tip...@li...] On Behalf Of Jon
Maloy
	Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 2:29 AM
	To: Mark Haverkamp
	Cc: tipc
	Subject: Re: [Tipc-discussion] RE: Another tipc observation
=09
=09
	Hi again.
	I just checked it in myself, along with some other corrections.
	I also added a corresonding file release, tipc-1.3.09
=09
	/jon
=09
	Mark Haverkamp wrote:
=09

		On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 11:06, Jon Maloy (QB/EMC) wrote:
		 =20

			Certainly not. I am surprised that it works at
all,
			given that the management code is not tested at
all
			yet. Feel free to correct it.
		=09
			Thanks /Jon
		=09
			   =20

		OK, here is a fix that works.  I made the change in the
node_get_nodes
		function.  It is only called by the manager.  If you
would rather, I
		could fix it in mng_cmd_event but that would require
casting the data
		buffer to a tipc_node_info and doing the htonl there.
	=09
		Mark.
	=09
		---
/home/markh/views/tipc/cvs/source/unstable/net/tipc/node.c
2004-03-30 07:11:39.000000000 -0800
		+++ node.c	2004-04-14 09:54:30.000000000 -0700
		@@ -613,8 +613,8 @@
		 	for(n =3D nodes;n;n =3D n->next) {
		 		if (!in_scope(scope,n->addr))
		 			continue;
		-                list[cnt].addr =3D n->addr;
		-                list[cnt].up =3D node_is_up(n);
		+                list[cnt].addr =3D htonl(n->addr);
		+                list[cnt].up =3D htonl(node_is_up(n));
		                 cnt++;
		 	};
		 	return (cnt * sizeof(struct tipc_node_info));
	=09
	=09
		 =20